HomeFundingProjectsSpirit of Rugby

Spirit of Rugby

England Rugby
Grantholder

A project to empower young people to enter the game of rugby-increasing players, volunteers, coaches, event managers and other roles in 15 England communities

Project information

£750,000

Grant amount

December 2014

Date awarded

January 2015 – October 2017

Project dates

England

Location

Project Detail

In 2014, in advance of the 2015 Men’s Rugby World Cup, Spirit solicited an application from the Rugby Football Union. The project was to form part of the community legacy of the 2015 Rugby World Cup, with activity in fifteen locations across England.

This project built on the inspiration of three major rugby events taking place in 2015 and 2016:  the Rugby World Cup (hosted in England and Wales), the Rio 2016 Olympic Games (which included Rugby 7s for the first time) and the Rio 2016 Paralympic Games (which included Wheelchair Rugby).  The RFU worked with community sports organisations in fifteen locations – 5 sites where World Cup matches were being played, 5 where there were training camps, and 5 that were not close to any World Cup activity.

Young volunteers and project staff in each area developed a mix of one-off events and regular activities to attract new participants into the game. Projects included:  rugby ‘holiday camps’ for young people from low income background in East Birmingham, delivered by local charity FITCAP, mixed ability rugby sessions in Brighton and the establishment of a new LGBTQ+ inclusive team, the Liverpool Tritons.

The project took place in Birmingham, Brighton, Bristol,  Croydon, Cumbria, Darlington, Exeter, Folkestone, Liverpool, Loughborough, Luton, Manchester, Norfolk, Northamptonshire and Portsmouth. You can read about what each location focused on in the project evaluation.

Spirit of Rugby had an ambitious delivery model, putting young people in the lead to design and deliver projects in their local area. Some project locations struggled with the freedom to develop project ideas and the evaluation report suggests they would have benefited from more structure and direction.

As well as churn amongst the volunteers, the ‘community stakeholder’ organisation changed in six of the fifteen locations, with the original organisations disengaging from the project. This led to a hiatus of at least six months while a replacement was found – although some of these went on to deliver highly successful projects, such as the creation of the Liverpool Tritons (still thriving at the time of writing in 2025). The evaluation suggested the most successful projects had clear frameworks for stakeholder organisation and volunteer support.

Impact & Learning

Key achievements:

Sheffield Hallam’s evaluation notes of one project location, “the key to [its] success lay in accepting that the key beneficiaries of the project were the volunteers who supported it, as much as the participants at the sessions which they provided”. This was an important theme across the projects. Of the 215 volunteers, 60 received formal training a part of Spirit of Rugby, and some had already gone on to paid employment in host organisations or the wider sporting sector.

The Sheffield Hallam Evaluation notes:

“The majority of volunteers reported improved time management (70%), more creative thinking (68%), better planning and co-ordination (62%) and improved problem-solving abilities (57%) as a direct consequence of engaging with the programme.”

“In addition, 84% of volunteers felt that they had developed new skills (as well as enhancing existing abilities). Perhaps most significantly, a clear majority of the volunteers had met new people (81%) and developed new contacts (73%)”

Key learnings

  • This project – like our grants to Youth Sport Trust for Breaking Boundaries (Cricket World Cup) and England Athletics for Team Spirit (World Athletics Championships) was developed to be aligned with a major sporting event but was not part of official legacy activities. All three projects may have benefited from making the event more central to their project design.
  • The project raised interested questions about to what extent a sporting event should be used to bring in new people or whether it ‘activates’ existing fans in different ways
  • Each group of young people was given control of a budget of £30,000 – a “daunting” sum, which the groups took very seriously, and found difficult to spend. Young people took it to heart when activities did not go to plan – poor weather disseminating attendance at one flagship event, for example. Freedom to experiment with different types of activity, and to “fail” was an important part of the development for young volunteers.
  • It was challenging to keep young volunteers engaged over the two-year period – there was high turnover as exams, leaving school and other milestones affected their ability to participate in the project. There is tension between desire to build long term relationships with young people, and how realistic it is to expect a consistent group of young people to engage over 2 years.

6,000

people

took part in regular activity with a further 4,000 in one-off events

215

regular volunteers

developed and ran the activities