The Eurovision Song Contest’s first ever schools programme and wellbeing evaluation.
Impact & Learning
Key achievements:
- Liverpool citizens engaged more in Eurovision events than they anticipated. Less than one fifth of pre-Eurovision survey respondents expected to get involved in the public events held in Liverpool, but more than one third actually reported attending a city or community event in a follow-up survey.
- 1% of those surveyed were enthusiastic about Liverpool hosting Eurovision on behalf of Ukraine, with women in particular being more enthusiastic about hosting Eurovision.
- Interviews conducted as part of the study showed that volunteers made new friends and felt valued for their work, and those from minoritized communities felt that Eurovision had created safe spaces for expression.
- EuroLearn events created a sense of solidarity with Ukraine. Participants valued the opportunity to share in Ukrainian culture and show their support.
- Many formal and informal partnerships began through the Eurovision activities: “we even inspired another school, another local school …. the art coordinator now has teamed up with me we are basically doing the same projects… so that’s children up to year 6 in art club studying the same artists so its lovely… and their demographic is very different from ours as well. They are in quite a deprived area so their demographic is different, so that’s good for us and good for them as well.”
- Liverpool City Council developed an ambitious evaluation plan for capturing the impact of Eurovision, experimenting with new ways to measure the impact of the competition. These methods are openly available for other major events to learn from.
Key learnings:
- The unique position of hosting the event on behalf of Ukraine helped to inspire the theme of “United by Music”, a slogan that the European Broadcasting Union, which owns the Eurovision franchise, has now adopted going forward. This meant the event was particularly suited to explore themes about social connection, bridging divides, citizenship and peace.
- The team at Liverpool City Council had the vision and expertise to expand an event beyond what was traditionally expected and draw in their wider community, despite having just 6 months between been designated and the global spectacle coming to town. The success of the event in some ways contradicts our arguments about the necessity of long-term planning. Much of this is down to the technical and creative skill, developed over many years before and after Liverpool was European Capital of Culture – but it is also down to a belief that events can achieve social outcomes for the community, and that the benefits go beyond the (large) economic boost from tourism.
- The Community & Wellbeing Evaluation found that average levels of wellbeing in Liverpool were already higher than the UK average before the event had taken place – report authors suggest that this was due to ‘anticipatory effects’ of people looking forward to the event. This report adds to other work highlighting the challenges of understand what the baseline should be to pick up the wellbeing and pride benefits of hosting major events.
- The ambitious evaluation programme was led by Prof Matthew Ashton, Director of Public Health for Liverpool City Council. This is unusual for a major event evaluation, and a strong indication of cross-government collaboration that makes achieving social outcomes more likely. In Liverpool, departments outside the Culture Team recognise the power of these activities to achieve things for their city.