A partnership between two major events organisers to share knowledge and insights and create a guide for other cities hosting events.
Impact & Learning
Key achievements
- 46 staff and 700 wider cultural and voluntary sector stakeholders engaged in knowledge exchange activities funded by the project.
- Bradford 2025 staff described the LEEDS 2023 team as generous and open with their learnings, and honest about the challenges they faced.
- It was worthwhile for the Leeds team, too, who described the process as validating.
- Particularly fruitful areas of learning included the volunteer programme, intelligence about different funders, introductions to international partners and discussions on how staff wellbeing could be nurtured.
- LEEDS 2023 were able to share many practical resources and templates, e.g. HR and procurement policies, to save the Bradford team time
- The informal, non-judgement 1-2-1 and small group conversations were just as valuable, if not more so, than larger scale training and workshops.
Key learning
Temporary organising committees are start-ups, and we often hear that they are expected to fly the plane whilst building it. Some events professionals working on Years of Culture and other similar events have advocated for a ‘blueprint’ for running such an event that they can adapt to their local context (this was Bradford 2025 and Leeds 2023’s third recommendation below).
However, a blueprint alone cannot capture the full depth of learning from a year-long programme of events. Toolkits and research reports are sometimes sanitised. You can’t ask them questions. A funded programme of knowledge exchange brings learning to life through open dialogue, anecdotal evidence, and off-the-record impressions. Finding time (and funding) for these conversations is crucial.
There are some challenges around the short life-span of delivery organisations and the limited cross-over between events. Staff reflected that there was a significant gap in the lifecycle of the organisations, with Leeds coming to the end of their year of culture at a time when Bradford was setting up. This was a busy time for both organisations, and at such an early stage it was not always clear to Bradford staff exactly what information they needed.
There was consensus across teams that knowledge exchange activities were implemented a bit too late, and it would have been beneficial for the timeline to be embedded earlier on in the year so that there was more overlap between the two organisations. Staff felt that this would have allowed more opportunities for reciprocal knowledge exchange, with Bradford sharing knowledge with Leeds before the end of their delivery year, as well as enabling the two teams to deliver knowledge sharing events collaboratively.