HomeFundingProjectsVolunteering Cities

Volunteering Cities

A funding programme to support volunteering infrastructure in four locations that bid for UK City of Culture 2025

Project information

£997,351

Grant amount

July 2022

Date awarded

September 2022 – March 2025

Project duration

Bradford, Great Yarmouth, Medway, Conwy

Location

Project Detail

Project summary

Volunteering Cities was a Spirit of 2012 funding initiative through which the bidders to UK City of Culture 2025 were invited to apply to Spirit to develop their local volunteering infrastructure, building upon the momentum from their City of Culture bid. Four grants totalling nearly £1million were awarded to four locations – Bradford, Conwy, Great Yarmouth and East Suffolk, and Medway – to support them with this. Spirit initiated the Volunteering Cities Fund to enable more UK cities to reap the benefits of events-driven volunteering, irrespective of whether they win the designation.

Each grantee was awarded £200,000 to support their project over 2.5 years, with additional funding of up to £50,000 to cover access-related costs.

The programme explored whether the momentum from City of Culture bids could be leveraged to create long-term cultural volunteering models. Projects targeted diverse, underserved communities with flexible, meaningful volunteering opportunities in arts, heritage, and community settings. Key shared aims included boosting wellbeing, inclusion, and civic pride through co-designed, localised volunteering pathways.

Evaluation of the programme was carried out by Neighbourly Lab, as part of a learning partnership, and their reports are available to read on this page.

Volunteering Cities grants supported the following four cultural volunteering programmes:

Medway Change Makers

Led by Ideas Test, the Change Makers programme created flexible, micro-volunteering opportunities, with the aim to recruit volunteers from communities with low participation rates, which could subsequently lead to increased arts and cultural engagement. The programme emphasised a quality volunteer experience, with meaningful opportunities, a rewards scheme, and training and support for local creative organisations. Upon the grant ending, Medway Change Makers was inherited by Tempo, who have taken on the programme’s branding and structure, with support from Ideas Test and Creative Medway.

Amdani! Conwy

Amdani! Conwy (Go! Conwy) was managed by Conwy County Borough Council, in partnership with Disability Arts Cymru and CVSC. Disability inclusion was a key aim for Amdani! with D/deaf and disabled people building skills and taking on leadership voluntary roles in the cultural sector. Co-production workshops shaped the programme, ensuring volunteers and host organisations received tailored support. The access budget was critical to the project’s approach, funding BSL interpreters, transport, personal assistants, and Access Riders (visual profiles for volunteers). Upon conclusion of the grant, CVSC took Amdani! Conwy forward. The project’s approach to co-production and access will be used to inform broader volunteering and cultural engagement strategies across Wales.

Cultural Connections – Great Yarmouth & East Suffolk

Cultural Connections was delivered by Great Yarmouth Borough Council and East Suffolk Council. The programme aimed to recruit from target groups including young people, those living in deprived areas, disabled people and those experiencing social isolation. It offered flexible volunteering opportunities, from helping at festivals and heritage sites, to community events, and remote online roles. Residents of Great Yarmouth and East Suffolk could apply for an Accessibility grant of up to £2,000 to alleviate barriers they face to volunteering. Activation grants of up to £1,000 were also available to small groups of volunteers and voluntary, community or social enterprise organisations to allow them to put on their own hyper local events and celebrate local culture. It was envisaged that this would inspire people to commit to further community action and volunteering. The Councils in Great Yarmouth and East Suffolk continue to manage Cultural Connections beyond the Spirit funding, with some of the key staff roles having been extended while further funding is sought.

Bradford Cultural Volunteering

Bradford was confirmed as UK City of Culture 2025 in May 2022. Their timeline and objectives consequentially differed from the other Volunteering Cities projects, centring around the establishment of a cultural volunteering programme for the UK City of Culture. The grant was awarded to City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, in partnership with Community Action Bradford & District and Bradford Culture Company. (Bradford 2025) In May 2024, the grant was novated from the Council to Bradford 2025, who formally became the organisation leading on the grant activities. The team aimed to recruit 1,750 volunteers in the run up to 2025, creating pathways into cultural volunteering. They exceeded these targets early on. Grassroots local partnerships enabled access for marginalised communities, and a wide range of volunteer roles were developed ahead of the 2025 activities.

Impact & Learning

Key achievements:

Across the four Volunteering Cities projects several themes emerged:

  • Strong volunteer engagement: All four locations were able to successfully recruit a cohort of volunteers and identify effective approaches for this, learning along the way from what wasn’t working well. Bradford registered 1,827 volunteers within the first quarter of 2025. Cultural Connections surpassed 600 volunteers by the end of their grant, far exceeding their original target of 240. Medway Change Makers experienced a surge of engagement later in the project, with 70% growth in total volunteers during the second year.
  • Diversity and inclusion: Each programme successfully engaged underrepresented groups. 52% of volunteers with Amdani! Conwy identified as d/Deaf or disabled. 48% of Medway Change Makers volunteers came from areas with the highest level of deprivation, with 20% of them having a health condition where they might normally face barriers to volunteering. Bradford achieved 53% participation from Global Majority backgrounds and 25% of their volunteers identified as disabled.
  • Improved wellbeing and confidence: All programmes reported significant improvements in wellbeing, social connection, and confidence among volunteers. Amdani! Conwy had 89% of volunteers report an increase in wellbeing. Volunteers in Medway engaged through a local mental health support charity reported that taking part in volunteering activity with Change Makers improved their wellbeing.

 

  • Flexibility and accessibility: Low commitment, flexible roles were offered. In-person or low-tech onboarding removed digital barriers. Micro-grants, reward schemes and tailored onboarding helped sustain engagement.
  • Capacity building: Support and training was provided to host organisations to ensure inclusive practices were followed. This provided a better experience for volunteers and promoted greater long-term sustainability for the volunteering programmes. Change Makers collaborated on a training programme with Square Pegs, a Medway-based theatre company that work with learning disabled and neurodiverse young adults. A learning resource was produced, with hopes that a training package can eventually be developed for host organisations to understand how they can best support event volunteers with learning disabilities.
  • Progression pathways: Volunteers frequently transitioned into further learning, employment, or continued volunteering. Bradford 2025 tracked 104 such outcomes and had high engagement from unemployed individuals and first-time volunteers. 44% of volunteers gained qualifications or progressed on to other volunteering or learning opportunities outside of Amdani! Conwy. Cultural Connections similarly saw volunteers gaining qualifications or roles outside of the programme. The team worked with colleges to offer students with additional needs long-term volunteering opportunities as part of a pathway course.

Key learning

Valuable learning was gained through each of the funded projects and can be read in more detail in the project reports. Challenges included ambitious bidding without the necessary local infrastructure, unclear definitions of ‘infrastructure’ and under-developed partnerships. Collectively, Neighbourly Lab outlined lessons from the Volunteering Cities projects in their final report, summarised below.

Partnerships:

  • Sustainable collaboration took time, careful planning and trust building with local, often small, organisations and partners.
  • Council involvement was often impacted by external pressures such as from COVID-19 and cost-of-living.
  • Many cultural organisations lacked capacity or understanding to take advantage of volunteer support and sometimes needed coaching and support on volunteer management.
  • Tensions existed with larger volunteer organisations wary of competition. Focusing on hyper-local groups often proved more effective.

Accessibility:

  • Prioritising inclusion from the beginning, through allocated staff and resources, led to wider reach and a more consistent experience for volunteers.
  • Incorporating social and in-person activities (such as coffee mornings, buddy systems) helped make participation more inclusive and was valued by volunteers.

Diversifying Volunteers:

  • Creative outreach strategies increased the diversity and retention of volunteers, but measuring outcomes was challenging. Collecting demographic data proved complex and raised concerns over intrusiveness.

Delivery, set-up and legacy:

  • Delivery teams faced the realities of building infrastructure from scratch. Hiring, outreach, training, policy development, and coordination were more time-consuming than anticipated and targets in the bids were often over-ambitious.
  • While projects all demonstrated strong groundwork, sustaining infrastructure post-grant remained a challenge. Transition planning and external funding are essential to sustain gains beyond the Spirit grant period.
  • Funders supporting projects of this nature should support honesty about limitations at the application stage and encourage transparent reflection of challenges.

Related content